JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 5, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Hernando Ramirez Arboleda

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Cumplimiento De Sentencia De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Se rechaza por improcedente y se remite a quien conoció de la acción de tutela en primera instancia
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia excepcional para conocer solicitud de cumplimiento
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-323/05.

El memorialista adujo que persiste el incumplimiento de las órdenes impartidas por la Corporación en el fallo de la referencia.

La Sala decide remitir la petición formulada al Juzgado Segundo de Menores de Manizales para que, como juez de primera instancia, proceda de inmediato a impartirle el trámite pertinente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Por Secretaria, REMITASE la solicitud formulada por el ciudadano HERNANDO RAMIREZ ARBOLEDA al Juzgado
  2. Segundo. de Menores de Manizales, para que, como juez de primera instancia de la sentencia T-323 del 4 de abril de 2005 (expediente T-1.007.443), proceda de inmediato a impartirle el tramite pertinente, de acuerdo con lo senalado en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.